There are really a couple of anomalies present in the standard Big Bang account. In reality there are no direct observations as nobody was present at Ground Zero all those billions of years ago. Those indirect observations that provide evidence for the Big Bang event are the fact that the Universe is expanding the Universe has a temperature – the remnants from the hot Big Bang called the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) and the amounts and ratio of hydrogen to helium.
Wow!Īt best observations that support this are indirect being made some 13.7 billion years after-the-fact. First there was nothing then there was something. The accepted theoretical account of the creation or event that kick-started our Universe off not only has that event a something that created all of matter and energy, but all of time and space as well, and this creation event, to boot, all took place in a volume less than that of a pinhead (something in the realm of the quantum) and for no apparent reason at all. It’s not fact just the most viable theory of many theories and it has serious flaws. THE BIG BANG EVENT: This is no doubt a concept that nearly everyone has heard about, and swallowed hook, line and cosmological sinker because scientists present this creation of the Universe scenario as fact. Here are a few of my favourite astronomical anomalies. These anomalies run the range from the Universe as a whole, down to your local neck of the woods, down in fact to the realms of the microscopic. There often tends to be a massive divide between observation and theory. Adequate explanations are not only lacking, but even the wildest possible theoretical explanations are rather thin on the ground. There are a myriad of things that are, but shouldn't be, or probably shouldn't be.
0 kommentar(er)
